<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some positive drag-and-drop experience</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.rayapps.com/2008/09/24/some-positive-drag-and-drop-experience/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.rayapps.com/2008/09/24/some-positive-drag-and-drop-experience/</link>
	<description>About Ruby, Oracle, Mac and others</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:18:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JulesLt</title>
		<link>http://blog.rayapps.com/2008/09/24/some-positive-drag-and-drop-experience/#comment-1228</link>
		<dc:creator>JulesLt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 14:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rayapps.wordpress.com/?p=49#comment-1228</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re right about the focus on internal web apps - my MD is constantly asking why application development isn&#039;t as simple as it was with Forms (he started out as a developer back with Forms 2.0 and I think stopped around Forms 2.3!). On the other hand, he also wants things that look nice.

On the BI side - you should take a look at our Dashboard product (linked in the website link) - it was started by our BOB guy, because he hated using Business Objects. It&#039;s a similar idea to Oracle&#039;s BI and Dashboard (I will be fair and say that in the 5 years since we started, Oracle have caught up a long way!) but it&#039;s got a nice architecture (you can pull the XML and SQL underlying any of the charts with a right-click, uses a local in-memory database to reduce the query burden on the main DB server, and all the usual any ODBC source type stuff).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re right about the focus on internal web apps &#8211; my MD is constantly asking why application development isn&#8217;t as simple as it was with Forms (he started out as a developer back with Forms 2.0 and I think stopped around Forms 2.3!). On the other hand, he also wants things that look nice.</p>
<p>On the BI side &#8211; you should take a look at our Dashboard product (linked in the website link) &#8211; it was started by our BOB guy, because he hated using Business Objects. It&#8217;s a similar idea to Oracle&#8217;s BI and Dashboard (I will be fair and say that in the 5 years since we started, Oracle have caught up a long way!) but it&#8217;s got a nice architecture (you can pull the XML and SQL underlying any of the charts with a right-click, uses a local in-memory database to reduce the query burden on the main DB server, and all the usual any ODBC source type stuff).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
